Investigating the DNA methylation profile of e-cigarette use
Rebecca G Richmond,
Jasmine N Khouja,
Claire L Prince,
Gemma C Sharp,
Caroline L Relton,
Marcus R Munafo,
Posted 31 Jan 2021
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2021.01.28.21250699
Posted 31 Jan 2021
Rationale and objectives Little evidence exists on the health effects of e-cigarette use. DNA methylation may serve as a biomarker for exposure and could be predictive of future health risk. We aimed to investigate the DNA methylation profile of e-cigarette use. Methods Among 117 smokers, 117 non-smokers and 116 non-smoking vapers, we evaluated associations between e-cigarette use and epigenome-wide methylation from saliva. We tested associations between e-cigarette use and methylation scores known to predict smoking and smoking-related disease. We assessed the ability of a methylation score for predicting e-cigarette use and for discriminating lung cancer. Measurements and Main Results 7 CpGs were identified in relation to e-cigarette use at p<1x10-5 and none at p<5.91x10-8. 13 CpGs were associated with smoking at p<1x10-5 and one at p<5.91x10-8. CpGs associated with e-cigarette use were largely distinct from those associated with smoking. There was strong enrichment of known smoking-related CpGs in the smokers but not the vapers. A methylation score for e-cigarette use showed poor prediction internally (AUC 0.55, 0.41-0.69) and externally (AUC 0.57, 0.36-0.74) compared with a smoking score (AUCs 0.80) and was less able to discriminate lung squamous cell carcinoma from adjacent normal tissue (AUC 0.64, 0.52-0.76 versus AUC 0.73, 0.61-0.85). Conclusions The DNA methylation profile for e-cigarette use is largely distinct from that of cigarette smoking, did not replicate in independent samples, and was unable to discriminate lung cancer from normal tissue. The extent to which methylation related to long-term e-cigarette use translates into chronic effects requires further investigation.
- Downloaded 184 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 123,852
- In epidemiology: 5,169
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 30,640
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 44,564
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!