Rxivist logo

Association between Use of Qingfei Paidu Tang and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A national retrospective registry study

By Lihua Zhang, Xin Zheng, Xueke Bai, Qing Wang, Bowang Chen, Haibo Wang, Jiapeng Lu, Shuang Hu, Xiaoyan Zhang, Haibo Zhang, Jiamin Liu, Ying Shi, Zhiye Zhou, Lanxia Gan, Xi Li, Jing Li

Posted 26 Dec 2020
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.12.23.20248444

BackgroundQingfei Paidu Tang (QPT), a formula of traditional Chinese medicine, which was suggested to be able to ease symptoms in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), has been recommended by clinical guidelines and widely used to treat COVID-19 in China. However, whether it decreases mortality remains unknown. PurposeWe aimed to explore the association between QPT use and in-hospital mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Study designA retrospective study based on a real-world database was conducted. MethodsWe identified patients consecutively hospitalized with COVID-19 in 15 hospitals from a national retrospective registry in China, from January through May 2020. Data on patients characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were extracted from the electronic medical records. The association of QPT use with mortality was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models based on propensity score analysis. ResultsOf the 8939 patients included, 28.7% received QPT. The crude mortality was 1.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8% to 1.7%) among the patients receiving QPT and 4.8% (95% CI 4.3% to 5.3%) among those not receiving QPT. After adjustment for patient characteristics and concomitant treatments, QPT use was associated with a relative reduction of 50% in in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.66 P <0.001). This association was consistent across subgroups by sex and age. Meanwhile, the incidence of acute liver injury (8.9% [95% CI, 7.8% to 10.1%]vs. 9.9% [95% CI, 9.2% to 10.7%]; odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.81% to 1.14%], P =0.658) and acute kidney injury (1.6% [95% CI, 1.2% to 2.2%] vs. 3.0% [95% CI, 2.6% to 3.5%]; odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.17], P =0.318) was comparable between patients receiving QPT and those not receiving QPT. The major study limitations included that the study was an observational study based on real-world data rather than a randomized control trial, and the quality of data could be affected by the accuracy and completeness of medical records. ConclusionsQPT was associated with a substantially lower risk of in-hospital mortality, without extra risk of acute liver injury or acute kidney injury among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Download data

  • Downloaded 217 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 116,418
    • In infectious diseases: 4,691
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 40,548
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 69,699

Altmetric data


Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide


PanLingua

News