African-lineage Zika virus replication dynamics and maternal-fetal interface infection in pregnant rhesus macaques
Chelsea M Crooks,
Andrea M Weiler,
Sierra L Rybarczyk,
Mason I Bliss,
Anna S. Jaeger,
Megan E Murphy,
Heather A. Simmons,
Michael K. Fritsch,
Jennifer M. Hayes,
Jens C. Eickhoff,
Ann M Mitzey,
Katarina M Braun,
Elizabeth A. Brown,
Phoenix M Shepard,
Kathleen M. Antony,
Terry K Morgan,
Emma L. Mohr,
Thaddeus G. Golos,
Posted 01 Dec 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.11.30.405670
Posted 01 Dec 2020
Following the Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak in the Americas, ZIKV was causally associated with microcephaly and a range of neurological and developmental symptoms, termed congenital Zika syndrome (CZS). The isolates responsible for this outbreak belonged to the Asian lineage of ZIKV. However, in-vitro and in-vivo studies assessing the pathogenesis of African-lineage ZIKV demonstrated that African-lineage isolates often replicated to high titer and caused more severe pathology than Asian-lineage isolates. To date, the pathogenesis of African-lineage ZIKV in a translational model, particularly during pregnancy, has not been rigorously characterized. Here we infected four pregnant rhesus macaques with a low-passage strain of African-lineage ZIKV and compared its pathogenesis to a cohort of four pregnant rhesus macaques infected with an Asian-lineage isolate and a cohort of mock-infected controls. Viral replication kinetics were not significantly different between the two experimental groups and both groups developed robust neutralizing antibody titers above levels considered to be protective. There was no evidence of significant fetal head growth restriction or gross fetal harm at delivery in either group. However, a significantly higher burden of ZIKV vRNA was found in maternal-fetal interface tissues in the macaques exposed to an African-lineage isolate. Our findings suggest that ZIKV isolates of any genetic lineage pose a threat to women and their infants.
- Downloaded 134 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 129,666
- In microbiology: 9,855
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 60,413
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 50,755
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!