Multiple measures of depression to enhance validity of Major Depressive Disorder in the UK Biobank
Kylie Patricia Glanville,
Jonathan RI Coleman,
David M Howard,
Ken B Hanscombe,
Bradley Scott Jermy,
Paul F O'Reilly,
Posted 22 Sep 2020
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.18.20196451
Posted 22 Sep 2020
Background: The UK Biobank (UKB) contains data with varying degrees of reliability and completeness for assessing depression. A third of participants completed a Mental Health Questionnaire (MHQ) containing the gold-standard Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) criteria for assessing mental health disorders. Aims: To investigate whether multiple observations of depression from sources other than the MHQ can enhance the validity of Major Depressive Disorder. Methods: In participants who did not complete the MHQ (n = 325k), we calculated the number of other depression measures endorsed, e.g. from hospital episode statistics and interview data. We compared cases defined this way to CIDI-defined cases for several estimates: the variance explained by polygenic risk scores (PRS), area under the curve attributable to PRS, SNP-based heritability, and genetic correlations with summary statistics from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Major Depressive Disorder (PGC MDD) GWAS. Results: The strength of the genetic contribution increased with the number of measures endorsed. For example, SNP-based heritability increased from 7% in cases who endorsed only one measure of depression, to 21% in cases who endorsed four or five measures of depression. The strength of the genetic contribution to cases defined by at least two measures approximated that for CIDI-defined cases. Most genetic correlations between UKB and PGC MDD exceeded 0.7, but there was variability between pairwise comparisons. Conclusions: Multiple measures of depression can serve as a reliable approximation for case-status where the CIDI measure is not available, indicating sample size can be optimised using the entire suite of UKB data.
- Downloaded 516 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 64,481
- In genetic and genomic medicine: 286
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 38,593
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 95,018
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!