Development and external validation of machine learning algorithms for postnatal gestational age estimation using clinical data and metabolomic markers
Malia S.Q. Murphy,
A. Brianne Bota,
Lindsay A. Wilson,
Beth K Potter,
Kathryn M. Denize,
Katelyn J. Rittenhouse,
Joan T. Price,
A.K. Azad Chowdhury,
Jeffrey S.A. Stringer,
Posted 25 Jul 2020
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.21.20158196
Posted 25 Jul 2020
Accurate estimates of gestational age at birth are important for preterm birth surveillance but can be challenging to reliably acquire in low and middle income countries. Our objective was to develop machine learning models to accurately estimate gestational age shortly after birth using clinical and metabolic data. We derived and internally validated three models using ELASTIC NET multivariable linear regression in heel prick blood samples and clinical data from a retrospective cohort of newborns from Ontario, Canada. We conducted external model validation in heel prick and cord blood sample data collected from prospective birth cohorts in Lusaka, Zambia (N=311) and Matlab, Bangladesh (N=1176). The best-performing model accurately estimated gestational age within about 6 days of early pregnancy ultrasound estimates in both cohorts when applied to heel prick data (MAE (95% CI) = 0.79 weeks (0.69, 0.90) for Zambia; 0.81 weeks (0.75, 0.86) for Bangladesh), and within about 7 days when applied to cord blood data (1.02 weeks (0.90, 1.15) for Zambia; 0.95 weeks (0.90, 0.99) for Bangladesh). Algorithms developed in Canada provided accurate estimates of gestational age when applied to external cohorts from Zambia and Bangladesh. Model performance was superior in heel prick data as compared to cord blood data.
- Downloaded 232 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 125,537
- In public and global health: 1,652
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 78,815
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 76,188
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!