Causes of variation in epigenetic aging across the lifespan
Ee Ming Wong,
Gillian S. Dite,
Nicola J. Armstrong,
Jeffrey M. Craig,
Karen A. Mather,
Perminder S. Sachdev,
Roger L. Milne,
Graham G Giles,
Melissa C Southey,
John L Hopper
Posted 15 May 2020
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.10.20097030
Posted 15 May 2020
Background DNA methylation-based biological age (DNAm age) is potentially an important biomarker for adult health. Studies in specific age ranges have found widely varying results about its causes of variation. We investigated these causes across the lifespan. Methods We pooled genome-wide DNA methylation data for 4,217 people aged 0-92 years from 1,871 families. DNAm age was calculated using the Horvath epigenetic clock. We estimated familial correlations in DNAm age for monozygotic (MZ) twin, dizygotic (DZ) twin, sibling, parent-offspring, and spouse pairs by cohabitation status. Genetic and environmental variance component models were fitted and compared. Results Twin pair correlations were -0.12 to 0.18 around birth, not different from zero (all P>0.29). For all pairs of relatives, their correlations increased with time spent living together (all P<0.02) at different rates (MZ>DZ and siblings>parent-offspring; P<0.001) and decreased with time spent living apart (P=0.02) at similar rates. These correlation patterns were best explained by cohabitation-dependent shared environmental factors, the effects of which were 1.41 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 1.66) times greater for MZ pairs than for DZ and sibling pairs, and the latter were 2.03 (95% CI, 1.13 to 9.47) times greater than for parent-offspring pairs. Genetic factors explained 13% (95% CI, -10% to 35%) of variation (P=0.27). Conclusion Variation in DNAm age is mostly caused by environmental factors, including those shared to different extents by relatives while living together and whose effects persist into old age. The equal environment assumption of the classic twin study might not hold for epigenetic aging.
- Downloaded 306 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 96,576
- In genetic and genomic medicine: 450
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 93,796
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 36,805
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!