Rxivist logo

Pandemic Politics: Timing State-Level Social Distancing Responses to COVID-19

By Christopher Adolph, Kenya Amano, Bree Bang-Jensen, Nancy Fullman, John Wilkerson

Posted 31 Mar 2020
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.30.20046326

Social distancing policies are critical but economically painful measures to flatten the curve against emergent infectious diseases. As the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19 spread throughout the United States in early 2020, the federal government issued social distancing recommendations but left to the states the most difficult and consequential decisions restricting behavior, such as canceling events, closing schools and businesses, and issuing stay-at-home orders. We present an original dataset of state-level social distancing policy responses to the epidemic and explore how political partisanship, COVID-19 caseload, and policy diffusion explain the timing of governors decisions to mandate social distancing. An event history analysis of five social distancing policies across all fifty states reveals the most important predictors are political: all else equal, Republican governors and governors from states with more Trump supporters were slower to adopt social distancing policies. These delays are likely to produce significant, on-going harm to public health.

Download data

  • Downloaded 9,720 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 1,089
    • In health policy: 9
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 1,576
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 633

Altmetric data

Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide