Early Spread of SARS-Cov-2 in the Icelandic Population
Daniel F. Gudbjartsson,
Olafur T Magnusson,
Gudmundur L. Norddahl,
Arna B Agustsdottir,
Elisabet E Gardarsdottir,
Olafia S Gretarsdottir,
Kjartan R Gudmundsson,
Thora R Gunnarsdottir,
Brynjar O Jensson,
Kamilla S Josefsdottir,
Droplaug N Magnusdottir,
Louise le Roux,
Kristin E Sveinsdottir,
Emil A Thorarensen,
Karl G. Kristinsson,
Posted 30 Mar 2020
medRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.26.20044446
Posted 30 Mar 2020
BACKGROUNDLimited data exist on how SARS-CoV-2 enters and spreads in the general population. METHODSWe used two strategies for SARS-CoV-2 testing: targeted testing of high-risk individuals (n=4,551) and a population screening (n=5,502). We sequenced SARS-CoV-2 from 340 individuals. RESULTSOn March 22 2020, 528 had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the targeted testing (11.6%) and 50 in the population screening (0.9%); approximately 0.2% of the Icelandic population. Large fractions of positives had travelled outside Iceland (38.4% and 34.0%). Fewer under 10 years old were positive than those older: 2.8% vs. 12.3% for targeted testing (P=1.6e-9) and 0.0% vs. 1.0% for population screening (P=0.031). Fewer females were positive in the targeted testing than males (9.5% vs. 14.6%, P=6.8e-9). SARS-CoV-2 came from eight clades, seven A clades and one B clade. The clade composition differed between the testing groups and changed with time. In the early targeted testing, 65.0% of clades were A2a1 and A2a2 derived from Italian and Austrian skiing areas, but in the later targeted testing went down to 30.6% and were overtaken by A1a and A2a, the most common clades in the population screening. CONCLUSIONSARS-CoV-2 has spread widely in Iceland outside of the high-risk groups. Several strains cause these infections and their relative contribution changed rapidly. Children and females are less vulnerable than adults and males. To contain the pandemic we must increase the scope of the testing.
- Downloaded 11,721 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 602
- In epidemiology: 88
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 12,670
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 10,022
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!