Shared genetics and couple-associated environment are major contributors to the risk of both clinical and self-declared depression
Ana M Fernandez-Pujals,
Pippa A. Thomson,
Jonathan D. Hafferty,
Blair H Smith,
Lynne J. Hocking,
Donald J MacIntyre,
David J. Porteous,
Chris S. Haley,
Andrew M. McIntosh
Posted 21 Sep 2016
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/076398 (published DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.11.003)
Posted 21 Sep 2016
Background: both genetic and environmental contributions to risk of depression have been identified, but estimates of their effects are limited. Commonalities between major depressive disorder (MDD) and self-declared depression (SDD) are also unclear. Dissecting the genetic and environmental contributions to these traits and their correlation would inform the design and interpretation of genetic studies. Methods: using data from a large Scottish family-based cohort (GS:SFHS, N=21,387), we estimated the genetic and environmental contributions to MDD and SDD. Genetic effects associated with common genome-wide genetic variants (SNP heritability) and additional pedigree-associated genetic variation and Non-genetic effects associated with common environments were estimated using linear mixed modeling (LMM). Findings: Both MDD and SDD had significant contributions from effects of common genetic variants, the additional genetic effect of the pedigree and the common environmental effect shared by couples. The correlation between SDD and MDD was high (r=1.00, se=0.21) for common-variant-associated genetic effects and moderate for both the additional genetic effect of the pedigree (r=0.58, se=0.08) and the couple-shared environmental effect (r=0.53, se=0.22). Interpretation: Both genetics and couple-shared environmental effects were the major factors influencing liability to depression. SDD may provide a scalable alternative to MDD in studies seeking to identify common risk variants. Rarer variants and environmental effects may however differ substantially according to different definitions of depression.
- Downloaded 238 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 66,560 out of 94,912
- In genetics: 3,604 out of 4,824
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 90,600 out of 94,912
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 86,048 out of 94,912
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!