Adventitious viruses persistently infect three commonly used mosquito cell lines
Nathan D. Grubaugh,
Michael J Misencik,
Philip M Armstrong,
Mark D. Stenglein,
Doug E. Brackney
Posted 08 May 2018
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/317628 (published DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2018.06.007)
Posted 08 May 2018
Mosquito cell lines were first established in the 1960's and have been used extensively in research to isolate and propagate arthropod-borne (arbo-) viruses, study the invertebrate immune system, and understand virus-vector interactions. Despite their utility as an in vitro tool, these cell lines are poorly defined and may harbor insect-specific viruses that could impact experimental results. Accordingly, we screened four commonly-used mosquito cell lines, C6/36 and U4.4 cells from Aedes albopictus, Aag2 cells from Aedes aegypti, and Hsu cells from Culex quinquefasciatus, for the presence of adventitious viruses. All four cell lines stained positive for double-stranded RNA by immunofluorescence, indicative of RNA virus replication. We subsequently identified viruses infecting Aag2, U4.4 and Hsu cell lines using untargeted next-generation sequencing, but not C6/36 cells. Sequences from viruses in the families Birnaviridae, Bunyaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Rhabdoviridae were abundant in the mosquito cell lines. PCR confirmation revealed that these sequences stem from active viral replication and/or integration into the cellular genome. Our results show that these commonly-used mosquito cell lines are persistently-infected with several viruses. This finding may be critical to interpreting data generated in these systems.
- Downloaded 663 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 70,599
- In microbiology: 4,215
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 135,336
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 118,865
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!