Comparison of methods that use whole genome data to estimate the heritability and genetic architecture of complex traits.
Luke M. Evans,
Scott I. Vrieze,
Doug W. Bjelland,
Teresa R. deCandia,
Haplotype Reference Consortium,
Michael E Goddard,
Benjamin M Neale,
Peter M. Visscher,
Matthew C. Keller
Posted 09 Mar 2017
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/115527 (published DOI: 10.1038/s41588-018-0108-x)
Posted 09 Mar 2017
Heritability, h2, is a foundational concept in genetics, critical to understanding the genetic basis of complex traits. Recently-developed methods that estimate heritability from genotyped SNPs, h2SNP, explain substantially more genetic variance than genome-wide significant loci, but less than classical estimates from twins and families. However, h2SNP estimates have yet to be comprehensively compared under a range of genetic architectures, making it difficult to draw conclusions from sometimes conflicting published estimates. Here, we used thousands of real whole genome sequences to simulate realistic phenotypes under a variety of genetic architectures, including those from very rare causal variants. We compared the performance of ten methods across different types of genotypic data (commercial SNP array positions, whole genome sequence variants, and imputed variants) and under differing causal variant frequencies, levels of stratification, and relatedness thresholds. These results provide guidance in interpreting past results and choosing optimal approaches for future studies. We then chose two methods (GREML-MS and GREML-LDMS) that best estimated overall h2SNP and the causal variant frequency spectra to six phenotypes in the UK Biobank using imputed genome-wide variants. Our results suggest that as imputation reference panels become larger and more diverse, estimates of the frequency distribution of causal variants will become increasingly unbiased and the vast majority of trait narrow-sense heritability will be accounted for.
- Downloaded 2,535 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 2,465 out of 89,390
- In genetics: 192 out of 4,624
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 53,022 out of 89,390
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 41,551 out of 89,390
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!