Rxivist logo

Method comparison studies of telomere length measurement using qPCR approaches: a critical appraisal of the literature

By Alyssa R. Lindrose, Lauren W.Y. McLester-Davis, Renee I. Tristano, Leila Kataria, Shahinaz M. Gadalla, Dan T. A. Eisenberg, Simon Verhulst, Stacy Drury

Posted 04 Sep 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.04.282632

Use of telomere length (TL) as a biomarker for various environmental exposures and diseases has increased in recent years. Various methods have been developed to measure telomere length. PCR-based methods remain wide-spread for population-based studies due to the high-throughput capability. While several studies have evaluated TL measurement methods, the results have been variable.   We conducted a literature review of TL measurement cross-method comparison studies that included a PCR-based method published between January 1, 2002 and May 25, 2020. A total of 20 articles were found that matched the inclusion criteria. Papers were reviewed for quality of methodologic reporting of sample and DNA quality, PCR assay characteristics, and analytic approaches to determine final TL was low as assessed by two different recommended reporting guidelines. Additionally, few papers reported whether samples were blinded for analysis. Reported correlation between methods (as assessed by Pearson’s r) varied, as did reported coefficients of variation or intra-class correlation coefficient. The sample size for nearly all studies was less than 100, raising significant concerns about statistical power. Overall, this review found that the current literature on the relation between TL measurement methods is lacking in validity and scientific rigor. To assist future investigators, we present recommendations for reporting guidelines of PCR-based TL measurement methods and present data to demonstrate the impact of assay variability on statistical power. Future cross-laboratory studies with rigorous methodologic and statistical reporting, adequate sample size, and blinding are essential to determine the true relation and variability of various TL measurement methods and are a key directive to the newly initiated Telomere Research Network funded jointly by then NIA and NIEHS. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Download data

  • Downloaded 206 times
  • Download rankings, all-time:
    • Site-wide: 96,554
    • In molecular biology: 2,889
  • Year to date:
    • Site-wide: 13,646
  • Since beginning of last month:
    • Site-wide: 19,974

Altmetric data


Downloads over time

Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide


PanLingua

Sign up for the Rxivist weekly newsletter! (Click here for more details.)


News