Method comparison studies of telomere length measurement using qPCR approaches: a critical appraisal of the literature
Alyssa R. Lindrose,
Lauren W.Y. McLester-Davis,
Renee I. Tristano,
Shahinaz M. Gadalla,
Dan T. A. Eisenberg,
Posted 04 Sep 2020
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.04.282632
Posted 04 Sep 2020
Use of telomere length (TL) as a biomarker for various environmental exposures and diseases has increased in recent years. Various methods have been developed to measure telomere length. PCR-based methods remain wide-spread for population-based studies due to the high-throughput capability. While several studies have evaluated TL measurement methods, the results have been variable. We conducted a literature review of TL measurement cross-method comparison studies that included a PCR-based method published between January 1, 2002 and May 25, 2020. A total of 20 articles were found that matched the inclusion criteria. Papers were reviewed for quality of methodologic reporting of sample and DNA quality, PCR assay characteristics, and analytic approaches to determine final TL was low as assessed by two different recommended reporting guidelines. Additionally, few papers reported whether samples were blinded for analysis. Reported correlation between methods (as assessed by Pearson’s r) varied, as did reported coefficients of variation or intra-class correlation coefficient. The sample size for nearly all studies was less than 100, raising significant concerns about statistical power. Overall, this review found that the current literature on the relation between TL measurement methods is lacking in validity and scientific rigor. To assist future investigators, we present recommendations for reporting guidelines of PCR-based TL measurement methods and present data to demonstrate the impact of assay variability on statistical power. Future cross-laboratory studies with rigorous methodologic and statistical reporting, adequate sample size, and blinding are essential to determine the true relation and variability of various TL measurement methods and are a key directive to the newly initiated Telomere Research Network funded jointly by then NIA and NIEHS. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.
- Downloaded 206 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 96,554
- In molecular biology: 2,889
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 13,646
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 19,974
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!