Genome-Wide Meta-Analyses Of Stratified Depression In Generation Scotland And UK Biobank
Lynsey S. Hall,
Mark J Adams,
David M Howard,
Ana Maria Fernandez-Pujals,
Eleanor M. Wigmore,
Thibaud S. Boutin,
Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium,
David J Porteous,
Ian J Deary,
Pippa A. Thomson,
Chris S Haley,
Andrew M McIntosh
Posted 24 Apr 2017
bioRxiv DOI: 10.1101/130229 (published DOI: 10.1038/s41398-017-0034-1)
Posted 24 Apr 2017
Few replicable genetic associations for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) have been identified. However recent studies of depression have identified common risk variants by using either a broader phenotype definition in very large samples, or by reducing the phenotypic and ancestral heterogeneity of MDD cases. Here, a range of genetic analyses were applied to data from two large British cohorts, Generation Scotland and UK Biobank, to ascertain whether it is more informative to maximize the sample size by using data from all available cases and controls, or to use a refined subset of the data - stratifying by MDD recurrence or sex. Meta-analysis of GWAS data in males from these two studies yielded one genome-wide significant locus on 3p22.3. Three associated genes within this region (CRTAP, GLB1, and TMPPE) were significantly associated in subsequent gene-based tests. Meta-analyzed MDD, recurrent MDD and female MDD were each genetically correlated with 6 of 200 health-correlated traits, namely neuroticism, depressive symptoms, subjective well-being, MDD, a cross-disorder phenotype and Bipolar Disorder. Meta-analyzed male MDD showed no statistically significant correlations with these traits after correction for multiple testing. Whilst stratified GWAS analysis revealed a genome-wide significant locus for male MDD, the lack of independent replication, the equivalent SNP-based heritability estimates and the consistent pattern of genetic correlation with other health-related traits suggests that phenotypic stratification in currently available sample sizes is currently weakly justified. Based upon existing studies and our findings, the strategy of maximizing sample sizes is likely to provide the greater gain.
- Downloaded 749 times
- Download rankings, all-time:
- Site-wide: 40,093
- In genetics: 1,766
- Year to date:
- Site-wide: 152,569
- Since beginning of last month:
- Site-wide: 147,353
Downloads over time
Distribution of downloads per paper, site-wide
- 27 Nov 2020: The website and API now include results pulled from medRxiv as well as bioRxiv.
- 18 Dec 2019: We're pleased to announce PanLingua, a new tool that enables you to search for machine-translated bioRxiv preprints using more than 100 different languages.
- 21 May 2019: PLOS Biology has published a community page about Rxivist.org and its design.
- 10 May 2019: The paper analyzing the Rxivist dataset has been published at eLife.
- 1 Mar 2019: We now have summary statistics about bioRxiv downloads and submissions.
- 8 Feb 2019: Data from Altmetric is now available on the Rxivist details page for every preprint. Look for the "donut" under the download metrics.
- 30 Jan 2019: preLights has featured the Rxivist preprint and written about our findings.
- 22 Jan 2019: Nature just published an article about Rxivist and our data.
- 13 Jan 2019: The Rxivist preprint is live!